Evidence, not attachments

Paperwork arrives sorted, not stapled.

Clients photograph payslips and statements once. The platform reads them into proposed facts with confidence scores, and nothing is treated as verified until a broker says so.

Hand-drawn kraft document folio tied with cord and sealed with red wax, beside a eucalyptus sprig

What you get

Documents that turn into evidence.

Upload from the couch

A phone photo or a PDF, in the middle of the conversation. Originals are kept exactly as they arrived.

Read into the file

Extraction lifts names, figures and dates into proposed facts, each with a confidence score and its source.

Oddities get flagged

Mismatched names and unusual figures are marked for a human eye, not smoothed over.

One ask, three places

Request a missing document once; the checklist, the client's messages and your task queue all update together.

From envelope to evidence

Four steps, none of them re-keying.

  1. The client uploads

    During the conversation or later from their status page, on whichever device holds the document.

  2. Extraction proposes

    Machine reading produces proposals, clearly marked as proposals, with the pages they came from.

  3. A broker verifies

    You confirm or reject each fact against the document. Verified means a licensed person looked.

  4. Corrections leave a trace

    Change a fact and the record keeps before, after, who and why. A material change sends stale numbers back for reassessment.

Where the line is drawn

Machine reading is never quietly truth.

Read the trust architecture

Proposed stays proposed

Extracted values become verified only when a licensed person confirms them.

History can't be tidied up

Corrections append. They never overwrite what was believed before.

Stale evidence stops the numbers

If the facts move, any assessment built on them is marked stale and must be re-run.